ClawSkills logoClawSkills

Self Improving Agent 1.0.1

Captures learnings, errors, and corrections to enable continuous improvement. Use when: (1) A command or operation fails unexpectedly, (2) User corrects Claude

Introduction

# Self-Improvement Skill

Log learnings and errors to markdown files for continuous improvement. Coding agents can later process these into fixes, and important learnings get promoted to project memory.

## Quick Reference

| Situation | Action | |-----------|--------| | Command/operation fails | Log to `.learnings/ERRORS.md` | | User corrects you | Log to `.learnings/LEARNINGS.md` with category `correction` | | User wants missing feature | Log to `.learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md` | | API/external tool fails | Log to `.learnings/ERRORS.md` with integration details | | Knowledge was outdated | Log to `.learnings/LEARNINGS.md` with category `knowledge_gap` | | Found better approach | Log to `.learnings/LEARNINGS.md` with category `best_practice` | | Similar to existing entry | Link with `**See Also**`, consider priority bump | | Broadly applicable learning | Promote to `CLAUDE.md`, `AGENTS.md`, and/or `.github/copilot-instructions.md` |

## Setup

Create `.learnings/` directory in project root if it doesn't exist:

```bash mkdir -p .learnings ```

Copy templates from `assets/` or create files with headers.

## Logging Format

### Learning Entry

Append to `.learnings/LEARNINGS.md`:

```markdown ## [LRN-YYYYMMDD-XXX] category

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp **Priority**: low | medium | high | critical **Status**: pending **Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config

### Summary One-line description of what was learned

### Details Full context: what happened, what was wrong, what's correct

### Suggested Action Specific fix or improvement to make

### Metadata - Source: conversation | error | user_feedback - Related Files: path/to/file.ext - Tags: tag1, tag2 - See Also: LRN-20250110-001 (if related to existing entry)

--- ```

### Error Entry

Append to `.learnings/ERRORS.md`:

```markdown ## [ERR-YYYYMMDD-XXX] skill_or_command_name

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp **Priority**: high **Status**: pending **Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config

### Summary Brief description of what failed

### Error ``` Actual error message or output ```

### Context - Command/operation attempted - Input or parameters used - Environment details if relevant

### Suggested Fix If identifiable, what might resolve this

### Metadata - Reproducible: yes | no | unknown - Related Files: path/to/file.ext - See Also: ERR-20250110-001 (if recurring)

--- ```

### Feature Request Entry

Append to `.learnings/FEATURE_REQUESTS.md`:

```markdown ## [FEAT-YYYYMMDD-XXX] capability_name

**Logged**: ISO-8601 timestamp **Priority**: medium **Status**: pending **Area**: frontend | backend | infra | tests | docs | config

### Requested Capability What the user wanted to do

### User Context Why they needed it, what problem they're solving

### Complexity Estimate simple | medium | complex

### Suggested Implementation How this could be built, what it might extend

### Metadata - Frequency: first_time | recurring - Related Features: existing_feature_name

--- ```

## ID Generation

Format: `TYPE-YYYYMMDD-XXX` - TYPE: `LRN` (learning), `ERR` (error), `FEAT` (feature) - YYYYMMDD: Current date - XXX: Sequential number or random 3 chars (e.g., `001`, `A7B`)

Examples: `LRN-20250115-001`, `ERR-20250115-A3F`, `FEAT-20250115-002`

## Resolving Entries

When an issue is fixed, update the entry:

1. Change `**Status**: pending` → `**Status**: resolved` 2. Add resolution block after Metadata:

```markdown ### Resolution - **Resolved**: 2025-01-16T09:00:00Z - **Commit/PR**: abc123 or #42 - **Notes**: Brief description of what was done ```

Other status values: - `in_progress` - Actively being worked on - `wont_fix` - Decided not to address (add reason in Resolution notes) - `promoted` - Elevated to CLAUDE.md, AGENTS.md, or .github/copilot-instructions.md

## Promoting to Project Memory

When a learning is broadly applicable (not a one-off fix), promote it to permanent project memory.

### When to Promote

- Learning applies across multiple files/features - Knowledge any contributor (human or AI) should know - Prevents recurring mistakes - Documents project-specific conventions

### Promotion Targets

| Target | What Belongs There | |--------|-------------------| | `CLAUDE.md` | Project facts, conventions, gotchas for all Claude interactions | | `AGENTS.md` | Agent-specific workflows, tool usage patterns, automation rules | | `.github/copilot-instructions.md` | Project context and conventions for GitHub Copilot |

### How to Promote

1. **Distill** the learning into a concise rule or fact 2. **Add** to appropriate section in target file (create file if needed) 3. **Update** original entry: - Change `**Status**: pending` → `**Status**: promoted` - Add `**Promoted**: CLAUDE.md`, `AGENTS.md`, or `.github/copilot-instructions.md`

### Promotion Examples

**Learning** (verbose): > Project uses pnpm workspaces. Attempted `npm install` but failed. > Lock file is `pnpm-lock.yaml`. Must use `pnpm install`.

**In CLAUDE.md** (concise): ```markdown ## Build & Dependencies - Package manager: pnpm (not npm) - use `pnpm install` ```

**Learning** (verbose): > When modifying API endpoints, must regenerate TypeScript client. > Forgetting this causes type mismatches at runtime.

**In AGENTS.md** (actionable): ```markdown ## After API Changes 1. Regenerate client: `pnpm run generate:api` 2. Check for type errors: `pnpm tsc --noEmit` ```

## Recurring Pattern Detection

If logging something similar to an existing entry:

1. **Search first**: `grep -r "keyword" .learnings/` 2. **Link entries**: Add `**See Also**: ERR-20250110-001` in Metadata 3. **Bump priority** if issue keeps recurring 4. **Consider systemic fix**: Recurring issues often indicate: - Missing documentation (→ promote to CLAUDE.md or .github/copilot-instructions.md) - Missing automation (→ add to AGENTS.md) - Architectural problem (→ create tech debt ticket)

## Periodic Review

Review `.learnings/` at natural breakpoints:

### When to Review - Before starting a new major task - After completing a feature - When working in an area with past learnings - Weekly during active development

### Quick Status Check ```bash # Count pending items grep -h "Status\*\*: pending" .learnings/*.md | wc -l

# List pending high-priority items grep -B5 "Priority\*\*: high" .learnings/*.md | grep "^## \["

# Find learnings for a specific area grep -l "Area\*\*: backend" .learnings/*.md ```

### Review Actions - Resolve fixed items - Promote applicable learnings - Link related entries - Escalate recurring issues

## Detection Triggers

Automatically log when you notice:

**Corrections** (→ learning with `correction` category): - "No, that's not right..." - "Actually, it should be..." - "You're wrong about..." - "That's outdated..."

**Feature Requests** (→ feature request): - "Can you also..." - "I wish you could..." - "Is there a way to..." - "Why can't you..."

**Knowledge Gaps** (→ learning with `knowledge_gap` category): - User provides information you didn't know - Documentation you referenced is outdated - API behavior differs from your understanding

**Errors** (→ error entry): - Command returns non-zero exit code - Exception or stack trace - Unexpected output or behavior - Timeout or connection failure

## Priority Guidelines

| Priority | When to Use | |----------|-------------| | `critical` | Blocks core functionality, data loss risk, security issue | | `high` | Significant impact, affects common workflows, recurring issue | | `medium` | Moderate impact, workaround exists | | `low` | Minor inconvenience, edge case, nice-to-have |

## Area Tags

Use to filter learnings by codebase region:

| Area | Scope | |------|-------| | `frontend` | UI, components, client-side code | | `backend` | API, services, server-side code | | `infra` | CI/CD, deployment, Docker, cloud | | `tests` | Test files, testing utilities, coverage | | `docs` | Documentation, comments, READMEs | | `config` | Configuration files, environment, settings |

## Best Practices

1. **Log immediately** - context is freshest right after the issue 2. **Be specific** - future agents need to understand quickly 3. **Include reproduction steps** - especially for errors 4. **Link related files** - makes fixes easier 5. **Suggest concrete fixes** - not just "investigate" 6. **Use consistent categories** - enables filtering 7. **Promote aggressively** - if in doubt, add to CLAUDE.md or .github/copilot-instructions.md 8. **Review regularly** - stale learnings lose value

## Gitignore Options

**Keep learnings local** (per-developer): ```gitignore .learnings/ ```

**Track learnings in repo** (team-wide): Don't add to .gitignore - learnings become shared knowledge.

**Hybrid** (track templates, ignore entries): ```gitignore .learnings/*.md !.learnings/.gitkeep ```

## Hook Integration

Enable automatic reminders through agent hooks. This is **opt-in** - you must explicitly configure hooks.

### Quick Setup (Claude Code / Codex)

Create `.claude/settings.json` in your project:

```json { "hooks": { "UserPromptSubmit": [{ "matcher": "", "hooks": [{ "type": "command", "command": "./skills/self-improvement/scripts/activator.sh" }] }] } } ```

This injects a learning evaluation reminder after each prompt (~50-100 tokens overhead).

### Full Setup (With Error Detection)

```json { "hooks": { "UserPromptSubmit": [{ "matcher": "", "hooks": [{ "type": "command", "command": "./skills/self-improvement/scripts/activator.sh" }] }], "PostToolUse": [{ "matcher": "Bash", "hooks": [{ "type": "command", "command": "./skills/self-improvement/scripts/error-detector.sh" }] }] } } ```

### Available Hook Scripts

| Script | Hook Type | Purpose | |--------|-----------|---------| | `scripts/activator.sh` | UserPromptSubmit | Reminds to evaluate learnings after tasks | | `scripts/error-detector.sh` | PostToolUse (Bash) | Triggers on command errors |

See `references/hooks-setup.md` for detailed configuration and troubleshooting.

## Automatic Skill Extraction

When a learning is valuable enough to become a reusable skill, extract it using the provided helper.

### Skill Extraction Criteria

A learning qualifies for skill extraction when ANY of these apply:

| Criterion | Description | |-----------|-------------| | **Recurring** | Has `See Also` links to 2+ similar issues | | **Verified** | Status is `resolved` with working fix | | **Non-obvious** | Required actual debugging/investigation to discover | | **Broadly applicable** | Not project-specific; useful across codebases | | **User-flagged** | User says "save this as a skill" or similar |

### Extraction Workflow

1. **Identify candidate**: Learning meets extraction criteria 2. **Run helper** (or create manually): ```bash ./skills/self-improvement/scripts/extract-skill.sh skill-name --dry-run ./skills/self-improvement/scripts/extract-skill.sh skill-name ``` 3. **Customize SKILL.md**: Fill in template with learning content 4. **Update learning**: Set status to `promoted_to_skill`, add `Skill-Path` 5. **Verify**: Read skill in fresh session to ensure it's self-contained

### Manual Extraction

If you prefer manual creation:

1. Create `skills/<skill-name>/SKILL.md` 2. Use template from `assets/SKILL-TEMPLATE.md` 3. Follow [Agent Skills spec](https://agentskills.io/specification): - YAML frontmatter with `name` and `description` - Name must match folder name - No README.md inside skill folder

### Extraction Detection Triggers

Watch for these signals that a learning should become a skill:

**In conversation:** - "Save this as a skill" - "I keep running into this" - "This would be useful for other projects" - "Remember this pattern"

**In learning entries:** - Multiple `See Also` links (recurring issue) - High priority + resolved status - Category: `best_practice` with broad applicability - User feedback praising the solution

### Skill Quality Gates

Before extraction, verify:

- [ ] Solution is tested and working - [ ] Description is clear without original context - [ ] Code examples are self-contained - [ ] No project-specific hardcoded values - [ ] Follows skill naming conventions (lowercase, hyphens)

## Multi-Agent Support

This skill works across different AI coding agents with agent-specific activation.

### Claude Code

**Activation**: Hooks (UserPromptSubmit, PostToolUse) **Setup**: `.claude/settings.json` with hook configuration **Detection**: Automatic via hook scripts

### Codex CLI

**Activation**: Hooks (same pattern as Claude Code) **Setup**: `.codex/settings.json` with hook configuration **Detection**: Automatic via hook scripts

### GitHub Copilot

**Activation**: Manual (no hook support) **Setup**: Add to `.github/copilot-instructions.md`:

```markdown ## Self-Improvement

After solving non-obvious issues, consider logging to `.learnings/`: 1. Use format from self-improvement skill 2. Link related entries with See Also 3. Promote high-value learnings to skills

Ask in chat: "Should I log this as a learning?" ```

**Detection**: Manual review at session end

### Agent-Agnostic Guidance

Regardless of agent, apply self-improvement when you:

1. **Discover something non-obvious** - solution wasn't immediate 2. **Correct yourself** - initial approach was wrong 3. **Learn project conventions** - discovered undocumented patterns 4. **Hit unexpected errors** - especially if diagnosis was difficult 5. **Find better approaches** - improved on your original solution

### Copilot Chat Integration

For Copilot users, add this to your prompts when relevant:

> After completing this task, evaluate if any learnings should be logged to `.learnings/` using the self-improvement skill format.

Or use quick prompts: - "Log this to learnings" - "Create a skill from this solution" - "Check .learnings/ for related issues"

More Products